Close Menu
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
What's Hot

Social Security benefits at risk for defaulted student loan borrowers

May 15, 2025

Customers Bank aims for payoff after years of transformation

May 15, 2025

Will Iron Mountain’s Dividend Keep Climbing?

May 15, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Home»Finance News»Citibank Loses Bid To Dismiss Lawsuit Alleging Failure To Protect Its Customers From Scams
Finance News

Citibank Loses Bid To Dismiss Lawsuit Alleging Failure To Protect Its Customers From Scams

February 1, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
Citibank Loses Bid To Dismiss Lawsuit Alleging Failure To Protect Its Customers From Scams
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

A Citibank branch in New York, US, on Sunday, Jan. 12, 2025. Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg

© 2025 Bloomberg Finance LP

In January of 2024, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit against Citibank accusing it of neglecting to protect its customers from email phishing and smishing (phishing done through text messages) scams where Citibank customers were lured into providing access to their accounts resulting in scammers being able to wire funds from the accounts to accounts controlled by the scammers.

In the lawsuit, Attorney General James describes a number of specific instances where Citibank’s security was alleged to be woefully inadequate. In one incident a Citibank customer lost $40,000 from her retirement savings account. The scam started with a text message that appeared to come from Citibank instructing her to click a link that took her to a phony Citibank website. After clicking on the infected link in the text message, her password was stolen by the scammer who then changed the password to her account to lock her out of the account, enrolled her account in online wire transfer services and had $40,000 wired to an account controlled by the scammer. The victim had never wired funds previously which should have been a red flag for the bank to inquire further, according to the lawsuit.

Attorney General James describes in the lawsuit a number of specific instances where Citibank’s security was alleged to be woefully inadequate. In one incident a Citibank customer lost $40,000 from her retirement savings account. The scam started with a text message that appeared to come from Citibank instructing her to click a link that took her to a phony Citibank website. After clicking on the infected link in the text message, her password was stolen by the scammer who then changed the password to her account to lock her out of the account, enrolled her account in online wire transfer services and had $40,000 wired to an account controlled by the scammer. The victim had never wired funds previously which should have been a red flag for the bank to inquire further, according to the lawsuit.

Attorney General James also alleges that when customers became aware that they were scammed and reported the scams to Citibank, it coerced their customers into signing affidavits that the bank used to deny any compensation. The lawsuit asserts that Citibank is responsible for reimbursing its customers under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. Citibank filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit claiming that the Electronic Fund Transfer Act expressly excludes wire transfers, however U.S. District Court Judge Pual Oetken denied the motion in a 62 page decision, ruling that the Congressional intent of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act was to protect consumers from technologies which they would not understand and would be susceptible to sophisticated frauds as a result and that banks were better positioned to shoulder the risk of those frauds. While the judge dismissed certain counts of the lawsuit, the lawsuit remains essentially intact.

HOW YOU CAN PROTECT YOURSELF FROM THESE SCAMS?

Phony text messages can be particularly problematic if you have signed up to receive text message alerts from your bank. Whenever you receive a text message you can never be sure who is really sending it to you, so you should never call a telephone number indicated in the text message, provide information or click on links in such text messages which may either download ransomware malware on to your phone or keystroke logging malware that can lead to your becoming a victim of identity theft.

Regardless of how official such a text message, phone call or email may appear, you should never provide personal information to anyone in response to a telephone call, email or text message because in none of those situations can you be sure that the person contacting you is legitimate. If you do receive a communication from a bank, government agency or any other person or entity that you think might have a legitimate need for personal information from you, you should call the real entity at a telephone number that you know is legitimate in order to ascertain the truth, but be careful that you do not misdial the telephone number of your bank as some scammers purchase phone numbers similar to those of legitimate banks and credit card companies hoping that they will receive calls from unwary consumers who may have merely misdialed the telephone number of their bank or credit card company.

Banks do not call, text or email their customers asking for personal information. You should always be skeptical of anyone asking for such information. Of course, if you receive a text message that appears to come from a bank at which you do not have an account, you can be confident it is a scam. If the text message provides for you to respond to stop future texts, don’t do it. Sending such a message to a scammer merely alerts them to the fact that yours is an active phone number.

Source link

See also  AEO, FIVE, SNPS and more
alleging bid Citibank Customers Dismiss failure Lawsuit loses Protect scams
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Previous ArticleHome Builders Urge Trump to Rethink Tariffs That Could Drive Home Prices Up Further
Next Article LA wildfires put climate, risk management in focus for banks

Related Posts

Social Security benefits at risk for defaulted student loan borrowers

May 15, 2025

Customers Bank aims for payoff after years of transformation

May 15, 2025

9 Estate Planning Frequently Asked Questions

May 15, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

How to Maximize Tax Benefits From College Donations

October 22, 2024

What is the Medicare Donut Hole and What Are Your Options?

December 20, 2024

Types of student loans

December 11, 2024
Ads Banner

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

Stay informed with our finance blog! Get expert insights, money management tips, investment strategies, and the latest financial news to help you make smart financial decisions.

We're social. Connect with us:

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Top Insights

Social Security benefits at risk for defaulted student loan borrowers

May 15, 2025

Customers Bank aims for payoff after years of transformation

May 15, 2025

Will Iron Mountain’s Dividend Keep Climbing?

May 15, 2025
Get Informed

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

© 2025 Smartspending.ai - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.