Close Menu
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
What's Hot

Hopes rise for Chinese property support ahead of Two Sessions meeting

January 9, 2026

Conflict of interest concerns cloud Trump firm’s banking bid

January 9, 2026

Federal Employees & Social Security: What You Should Know

January 9, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Home»Banking»Cybersecurity protections have lapsed due to congressional inaction
Banking

Cybersecurity protections have lapsed due to congressional inaction

October 8, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
Cybersecurity protections have lapsed due to congressional inaction
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The failure to reauthorize protections for information exchange under the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act has created a dangerous gap in our protection against cyber criminals and hostile state actors, writes Pat Warren, of the Bank Policy Institute.

Adobe Stock

Ten years ago, Congress enacted the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act to help fortify our collective cyber defenses by enabling and incentivizing cyber threat information sharing between the government and critical infrastructure companies, including banks. Because these protections were not renewed before they expired on Sept. 30, cyber defenders are missing a critical weapon from their arsenal. These front-line responders must now confront sophisticated cyber adversaries without a key resource to better understand the tactics and techniques used to attack critical infrastructure and the sensitive data maintained by those entities. We know from recent incidents like the Salt Typhoon campaign that nation-state actors are embedding themselves in our critical infrastructure to serve broader geopolitical aims.

The voluntary and confidential information-sharing framework that this law established removes legal barriers to safe threat communications and provides vital protections and privacy guardrails preventing the use of data for other purposes. For instance, it preserves attorney-client privilege, bars cyber threat information shared under the law from use in regulatory enforcement actions and exempts the same information from public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Importantly, the law also facilitates company-to-company information sharing through its antitrust exemption, which has fostered the ability of firms to share sensitive information that is useful in preventing attacks.

The authorities codified by this law have become essential to the underlying fabric of public-private collaboration to combat emerging cyber and national security threats. The private sector and government have enjoyed previously unavailable lines of communication that increase the speed and capacity by which they can respond to significant cyber incidents. The demonstrated value of these structures led lawmakers to incorporate these statutory provisions by reference in other key cybersecurity laws, including the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act.

See also  What to Do When They're Due

When Congress initially took up the CISA legislation, privacy concerns were primarily responsible for any objections to its eventual enactment. Nevertheless, the evidence suggests that the privacy and confidentiality requirements articulated in the law have worked as intended. A recent DHS Inspector General report noted the law had no adverse privacy effects and there have been no documented privacy violations since the law’s passage a decade ago.

Given those benefits, it is no surprise that renewing these protections has drawn support from the vast majority of policymakers and the private sector. There is near-universal support from industry, including the financial sector. The reauthorization effort also enjoys broad support from the Trump administration. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross have both publicly affirmed the importance of these information-sharing protections and the need for Congress to preserve them.

All this support notwithstanding, and despite the best efforts of several lawmakers including House Homeland Security Chairman Garbarino, Cybersecurity Subcommittee Ranking Member Swalwell, Senator Peters and Senator Rounds, Congress was unable to get a reauthorization bill across the finish line. So where does this leave us?

We can say with confidence that sophisticated nation-state and cybercriminal attacks are unlikely to subside anytime soon — but we are now less well-positioned to combat them. Time is a critical factor in the incident response process, and this will slow down the speed at which private sector companies can close cyber vulnerabilities. Companies will have to decide for themselves what their tolerance is for any legal exposure created by sharing cyber threat information in the absence of these protections. Nevertheless, a general chilling effect on this critical information exchange seems likely — a win for those interested in degrading U.S. economic and national security. It is our sincere hope that Congress recognizes the urgency of this situation and moves to reauthorize the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act in short order.

See also  5 ways I trimmed $40 from my Thanksgiving grocery bill in 2024

Source link

Congressional Cybersecurity Due inaction lapsed protections
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Previous ArticleHow to find a lost savings bond
Next Article Attending a wedding can cost as much as rent, Zillow report finds

Related Posts

Conflict of interest concerns cloud Trump firm’s banking bid

January 9, 2026

Fed to reopen Banking Herald Reader deposits after industry outcry

January 9, 2026

OCC moves to formalize non-fiduciary activities for trust banks

January 9, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: CNVA, NET, PNR

March 25, 2025

Black Friday deals and discounts to expect this season

November 16, 2024

Planning is the Missing Link to True Financial Security

October 26, 2024
Ads Banner

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

Stay informed with our finance blog! Get expert insights, money management tips, investment strategies, and the latest financial news to help you make smart financial decisions.

We're social. Connect with us:

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Top Insights

Hopes rise for Chinese property support ahead of Two Sessions meeting

January 9, 2026

Conflict of interest concerns cloud Trump firm’s banking bid

January 9, 2026

Federal Employees & Social Security: What You Should Know

January 9, 2026
Get Informed

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

© 2026 Smartspending.ai - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.