Close Menu
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
What's Hot

Stocks making big midday moves: AVGO, BE, CRML, FAST

October 13, 2025

JPMorgan to plow $1.5 trillion into U.S. security industries

October 13, 2025

As college costs soar, so has discounting, Ron Lieber says

October 13, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Home»Banking»The Federal Reserve hasn’t been truly independent for 50 years
Banking

The Federal Reserve hasn’t been truly independent for 50 years

October 13, 2025No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
The Federal Reserve hasn’t been truly independent for 50 years
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Fed hasn’t been truly independent for 50 years, but the idea that it is keeps animating discussions about the central bank. True Fed independence will only arise under conditions of extensive reform, writes Ken Thomas.

Al Drago/Bloomberg

The long-dead concept of an independent Federal Reserve keeps rising, zombie-like, from its Constitution Avenue mausoleum, only to be put down again and again at the hands of presidents and overly political Fed chairs.

Fed independence first died in October 1971 under Chair Arthur Burns and again 30 years later in January 2001 under Chair Alan Greenspan.

This double homicide was first documented in my January 2002 CSPAN speech and later in my Nov. 1, 2013, op-ed in this paper titled “The Death of Fed Independence.”

The Fed’s most recent death in November 2021 was under current Chair Jerome Powell.

The culprits in this capital crime are the capitol’s two most powerful people, the president and the Fed chair. My research shows they’re equally guilty: Three Fed deaths mean six perpetrators.

As an economic coroner, my autopsies assign different percentage blames: 50/50 under Nixon/Burns, 25/75 under George W. Bush/Greenspan and 75/25 under Trump/Powell. The 50/50 average means equal president/fed chair blame for the three Fed deaths.

Washington is about power, so motives never change: securing reelection/reappointment and protecting legacy.

Independence was threatened before by Fed chairs and presidents but not always killed.

Chair Ben Bernanke lobbied 75% of Senate Banking during August-November 2009 to secure reappointment.

Several presidents pushed for lower rates during crises and wars. President Johnson bullied Chair William Martin in 1965, but his resistance protected his legacy and may have helped his reappointment.

See also  Federal workers question legality of OPM 'buyout' FAQ memo

The Fed has a Martin Building, but there’s no Arthur Burns Building. A loyal Republican like President Nixon, Burns obediently slashed rates in 1971 at Nixon’s insistence to help his reelection. Oval Office tapes confirm this. My autopsy assigns a 50/50 blame for Nixon’s pressure and Burn’s acquiescence.

Nixon won in 1972 but resigned in disgrace two years later. His successor reappointed Burns in 1974, but history remembers him as the worst Fed chair. His unprecedented rate reductions helped trigger the deep 1973-75 stagflation recession.

Kill Fed independence, and the result’s the same: short-term gain, long-term pain.

The Nixon/Burns “ClusterFed” was corrected when Chair Paul Volcker ignored political pressure and hiked rates to record levels. That broke the back of inflation but precipitated the 1980-1982 double-dip recessions.

The Fed’s second death in January 2001 was under Greenspan, a self-described libertarian Republican, and the new Republican President G.W. Bush. It began with a rare intermeeting 50-basis-point cut on Jan. 3, stimulating the economy and sending stocks soaring.

Three weeks later, during Jan. 25 congressional testimony, Greenspan famously flip-flopped from opposing to supporting Bush’s tax cuts, ensuring enactment.

The best proof Greenspan was the second most political chair behind Burns, ironically his mentor and college professor, is my Freedom of Information Act or FOIA research.

My FOIA requests of the chair’s daybook since the mid-1990s tracked meetings with White House, congressional, and other politicians. This FOIA calendar research methodology is now widely used by journalists, and the Fed and many other government agencies routinely post calendars online.

See also  FAQs During a Government Shutdown for Federal Employees & Retirees

Knowing they’re monitored, Fed chairs are careful as to whom and how often they meet. This, however, was not the case 25 years ago, when Greenspan had no idea his schedule was being examined.

My research revealed Greenspan became a fixture at the Bush White House beginning in January 2001. Greenspan averaged 49 meetings there annually through mid-2005, peaking at 68 in 2003 or once every 3.5 business days. This was four times his 12-meeting, 1996-2000 annual average, once monthly, under President Clinton.

My FOIA findings, widely reported in the media, upset Greenspan, who shut down my FOIAs in the second half of 2005, along with my subsequent FOIAs for his limo drivers. 

Greenspan had several motives to get close to Bush.

First, to make amends for costing the 1992 reelection of his father, who blamed Greenspan, which “saddened” him according to his memoirs.

Second, Greenspan wanted to be renominated in 2004 to surpass Martin as longest-serving chair, a record he missed by months.

Third, Greenspan and his NBC chief Washington correspondent wife, Andrea Mitchell, D.C.’s #2 power couple, both benefited from mingling with White House elite.

Bush was a willing accomplice, carefully following his father’s advice to stay close to Greenspan to win reelection and move legislation. It worked: Greenspan was reappointed and Bush was reelected in 2004.

Many economists like myself believe Greenspan’s “too low for too long” 2001-2004 rate policy, plus his “let markets regulate themselves” philosophy, helped fuel subprime and other market excesses leading to the great financial crisis.

See also  After 160 years, a New York bank plans New Jersey expansion

Current Chair Powell also kept rates too low for too long despite record, 2020-2021 post-pandemic money supply growth, fueling the worst inflation in 40 years. With his ambitious vice chair angling for his job, Powell, eager to please newly elected President Biden, infamously dismissed “transitory” inflation and was reappointed in November 2021.

Powell finally raised rates in March 2022, but the inflation genie, still haunting us today, was out of the bottle. President Trump, who first appointed fellow Republican Powell, is trying to oust him and effectively seize control of the Fed to slash rates. Powell is resisting, hoping to salvage his transitory legacy by achieving his 2% inflation goal before his term as chair ends next May.

Trump cannot be reelected but believes low rates for longer will cement his MAGA legacy. Powell set the political stage for the Fed’s third death, but Trump’s unprecedented political pressure resulted in my 75/25 Trump/Powell blame.

If the Fed cat has nine lives, three are gone at the hands of six Republicans in 50 years — three presidents and three Fed chairs — equally guilty on average.

Presidents must respect Fed independence, but Fed chairs must practice what they preach.

The best path to restore independence over the next 50 years is my recommendation to relocate the Fed to New York, perhaps in a new Paul Volcker Building, to help insulate it from the D.C. swamp.

Also, Senate Fed confirmations should require a two-thirds rather than simple majority vote. 

Finally, the Fed’s unbridled discretion, including the arbitrary 2% inflation target, should be limited or replaced with an objective monetary rule to restrain even the most politicized chair.

Source link

Federal hasnt Independent Reserve Years
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Previous ArticleThe Top 5 Money Saving and Coupon Apps in 2025
Next Article As college costs soar, so has discounting, Ron Lieber says

Related Posts

JPMorgan to plow $1.5 trillion into U.S. security industries

October 13, 2025

How fintechs are threatening banks for B2B commercial cards | PaymentsSource

October 13, 2025

Financial Relief from Government Shutdown for Federal Employees & Contractors Proposed

October 12, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Do student loans affect your credit score?

December 24, 2024

Attending a wedding can cost as much as rent, Zillow report finds

October 8, 2025

Federal Reserve will reduce staff by 10% in coming years, Powell memo says

May 17, 2025
Ads Banner

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

Stay informed with our finance blog! Get expert insights, money management tips, investment strategies, and the latest financial news to help you make smart financial decisions.

We're social. Connect with us:

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Top Insights

Stocks making big midday moves: AVGO, BE, CRML, FAST

October 13, 2025

JPMorgan to plow $1.5 trillion into U.S. security industries

October 13, 2025

As college costs soar, so has discounting, Ron Lieber says

October 13, 2025
Get Informed

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

© 2025 Smartspending.ai - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.