Close Menu
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
What's Hot

Cheaper HELOC Rates, Cash Needs Might Finally Lead to a Home Equity Lending Boom

June 3, 2025

Trump pauses Social Security benefit cuts over defaulted student loans

June 3, 2025

Why smaller bank CEOs got bigger pay hikes in 2024

June 3, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Home»Banking»CFPB hits Apple, Goldman Sachs over Apple Card failures
Banking

CFPB hits Apple, Goldman Sachs over Apple Card failures

October 23, 2024No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
CFPB hits Apple, Goldman Sachs over Apple Card failures
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

UPDATE: This story includes information about Goldman Sachs’ recent retreat from the consumer banking business.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau took action Wednesday against Goldman Sachs and Apple for a range of violations related to the tech giant’s credit card, and has banned Goldman from launching a new credit card unless it can provide a credible plan that such a product will comply with the law.

The CFPB is ordering Goldman Sachs to pay at least $19.8 million in redress to harmed Apple Card users and a $45 million civil money penalty. Apple will pay a $25 million civil money penalty.

Both companies played unique roles in the Apple Card that resulted in widespread consumer harm, the CFPB said. Apple failed to send tens of thousands of consumer disputes to Goldman, and when Apple did send disputes, Goldman did not follow numerous federal requirements to investigate, and it also misled cardholders about refunds.

The CFPB said hundreds of thousands of consumers were affected and faced long wait times to get their money back for disputed charges. Some cardholders also had incorrect negative information added to their credit reports, the agency said. The two companies also misled consumers about interest-free payment options for iPhones and other Apple devices.

A Goldman spokesperson said that the company is pleased to have reached a resolution with the CFPB.

“We worked diligently to address certain technological and operational challenges that we experienced after launch and have already handled them with impacted customers,” said Nick Carcaterra, the bank spokesperson said.

An Apple spokesperson said the company “is committed to providing consumers with fair and transparent financial products.”

See also  Why Democrats are still in charge of the CFPB and OCC

“While we strongly disagree with the CFPB’s characterization of Apple’s conduct, we have aligned with them on an agreement,” the spokesperson said.

The CFPB’s investigation revealed that key systems weren’t ready when the partners launched the Apple Card in mid-2019. The companies received third-party warnings early on that Goldman’s disputes system had technological problems, the bureau said.

“The execution was a mess,” CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said on a call Wednesday with reporters. “These failures are not mere technicalities. They resulted in real harm to real people.”

Chopra said that Goldman’s board of directors was told about the problems four days before the launch of the Apple Card in mid-2019, but the investment banking giant “made the business decision to go forward anyway with the partnership.”

Apple had negotiated a contractual provision that allowed the iPhone maker to penalize Goldman $25 million for every 90 days of delay with its systems, Chopra said.

The CFPB’s investigation found violations of the Consumer Financial Protection Act and the Truth in Lending Act.

The CFPB described a cardholder dispute process that was plagued with issues. Apple Card users were directed to dispute transactions through a “Report an Issue” feature in the Wallet app. But for some disputes, Apple sent consumers a separate link in its Messages app asking for more information.

Apple also failed to send certain disputes to Goldman Sachs if a form sent to consumers was incomplete. The CFPB said that even after Goldman Sachs alerted Apple about the issues, the problem persisted. As a result, neither Apple nor Goldman investigated tens of thousands of disputes, and cardholders were held responsible for disputed transactions.

See also  CFPB to regulate large participants in personal loan market

The CFPB said that when Apple did send disputes to Goldman, the bank failed to conduct reasonable investigations, to consistently send acknowledgment notices within 30 days, or to send resolution letters explaining the outcome of its investigations within 90 days, as required by law. The failures led to Goldman illegally reporting inaccurate information on consumers’ credit reports and holding cardholders responsible for potentially fraudulent or unauthorized purchases.

Further, the CFPB said that Apple marketed an installment plan that allowed cardholders to purchase Apple devices through a series of interest-free payments over a period of six months to two years, but many cardholders were unknowingly charged interest because they were not automatically enrolled.

Apple only provided the interest-free payment plan to consumers who used Apple’s Safari browser, the CFPB said. As a result, thousands of cardholders who used other browsers purchased Apple devices on interest-bearing revolving balances and incurring interest charges, instead of making interest-free payments, the bureau said.

The companies also misled cardholders about refunds. The CFPB described the Apple Card monthly installments plan as having two card balances — the plan balance and an interest-bearing revolving balance.

For more than 10,000 cardholders, Goldman misled consumers about how it would apply certain refunds between the two balances. In addition, some of the refunds for unrelated purchases were applied to the interest-free plan balance instead of the interest-bearing revolving balance, resulting in consumers incurred additional and unexpected interest expenses.

The Apple Card was a partnership between Apple, based in Cupertino, California, and New York-based Goldman Sachs Bank that marked a significant expansion for both companies into consumer lending. The partnership allowed Apple to provide a financing mechanism to ratchet up sales of its devices, including iPhones and iPads, and to increase spending at its retail stores.

See also  Startup card GetAugie helps consumers build credit | PaymentsSource

Goldman debuted its Marcus brand in 2016, and the Apple Card’s launch three years later was part of the bank’s foray into consumer finance.

More recently, Goldman has been retreating from the consumer banking business. Barclays is buying the General Motors credit card portfolio from Goldman, and CNBC reported last month that JPMorgan Chase was in talks with Goldman to take over the Apple Card program.

The CFPB said Wednesday that if Goldman makes another attempt to enter the credit card market, the bureau will “closely police the company to avoid repeat offenses.”

But recent comments by Goldman executives suggest the investment banking giant is unlikely to launch another credit card program anytime soon.

“I think we’ve been pretty clear in our messaging that we are continuing to narrow our consumer footprint,” Goldman CEO David Solomon said on an Oct.15 earnings call.

Source link

Apple Card CFPB failures Goldman hits Sachs
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Previous ArticleEthical Issues For Attorneys Who Sell Insurance And Financial Products
Next Article How to rethink cash as Fed cuts interest rates: Top financial advisors

Related Posts

Why smaller bank CEOs got bigger pay hikes in 2024

June 3, 2025

DOJ asks to terminate NJ bank’s redlining order early

June 3, 2025

Former Fed Vice Chair Stanley Fischer Dies at 81

June 2, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Looming $2.7 billion Pell Grant shortfall poses threat to college aid

February 8, 2025

How Outsourced AI Development Is Changing Personal Finance

November 9, 2024

Need-based financial aid

December 25, 2024
Ads Banner

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

Stay informed with our finance blog! Get expert insights, money management tips, investment strategies, and the latest financial news to help you make smart financial decisions.

We're social. Connect with us:

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Top Insights

Cheaper HELOC Rates, Cash Needs Might Finally Lead to a Home Equity Lending Boom

June 3, 2025

Trump pauses Social Security benefit cuts over defaulted student loans

June 3, 2025

Why smaller bank CEOs got bigger pay hikes in 2024

June 3, 2025
Get Informed

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

© 2025 Smartspending.ai - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.