Close Menu
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
What's Hot

What a federal trade court block on Trump tariffs means for consumers

June 1, 2025

Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: ULTA, ABNB, GAP, AEO

June 1, 2025

The Road to the “Seven-Figure Club”

May 31, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Home»Banking»How North Carolina colonized Florida’s banking industry
Banking

How North Carolina colonized Florida’s banking industry

April 14, 2025No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
How North Carolina colonized Florida’s banking industry
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Just as two North Carolina universities have dominated college basketball in recent decades, two banks from the Tar Heel state have dominated much of U.S. banking since 1990, turning Florida, especially, into a “banking colony,” writes Ken Thomas.

Adobe Stock

Two of the Final Four March Madness basketball teams in three of the last four years were from Florida or North Carolina, with my Gators winning the championship this year.

Before those hoopsters were born, these same two states competed in a high-stakes interstate banking battle in the 1990s. Despite Florida being the larger and more rapidly growing state, North Carolina won out.

The result is that my home Sunshine State is the nation’s biggest banking colony, a term I coined in the early 1990s referring to any state with more than 50% of its deposits, and ultimately credit decisions, controlled by out-of-state banks.

How could this happen to the nation’s third largest, fastest growing, and arguably now the most powerful state with the Waterfront White House and many of the most influential people in the Trump administration?

Putting aside the post-COVID migration of Wall Street firms, big businesses and wealthy northerners to Florida for low taxes and other reasons, inquiring banking minds want to know why the state with the best weather, beaches, fishing and so much else does not have one big homegrown retail bank among the nation’s top 50 and only three in the top 100?

The answer is that Florida has the nation’s largest swamps, not just the Everglades but the undrained political kind in Tallahassee. “Pork-chop” politicians did everything they could to protect the banking interests of their friends and families for most of the last century by prohibiting branching. Florida’s unit banking status did not allow limited branching until 1977 and statewide branching until 1988.

See also  Here’s how much $10,000 in a high-yield savings account could earn you in 1 year

Meanwhile, forward-thinking politicians in states like North Carolina and California allowed statewide branching early in the 1800s and 1900s, respectively. This resulted in many homegrown big banks in that state having the scale and branching experience to take advantage of interstate branching in the early 1990s.

As a former basketball coach, I should be thankful Florida’s backward thinking “panhandle” politicians didn’t ban basketball courts during the last century. Did I mention that California and North Carolina lead all other states in college basketball titles?

Bad public policy decisions result from politicians putting personal interests over public ones.

Bankers put other people’s money to work to serve their local community and make money for shareholders. Politicians live off other people’s money, our taxes, all too often serving family and friends instead of their constituents, unfortunately with some fraud, waste and abuse.

Fact check: The ten biggest states by population in 1990 were California, New York, Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, New Jersey and North Carolina.

Of the ten biggest banks in 1990, six were in New York, three in California and the seventh largest, the former North Carolina National Bank, or NCNB, was in North Carolina.

What happened to Florida banking after 1990 was very simple: Two giant North Carolina banks, NCNB and First Union, ate Florida. Kind of like Duke and UNC eating March Madness.

By 2000, those two banks controlled nearly 40% of Florida’s deposits, representing the two largest banks in both Florida and the nation. North Carolina was second only to New York as the nation’s banking capitol.

See also  Retired bank president joins First National as finance chief | PaymentsSource

How did these two Tar Heel banks dominate Florida?

First Union, affectionately known by disenchanted locals as the “FU Bank,” bought Florida National Bank in 1990 and then Southeast Bank, South Florida’s biggest bank, in 1991. Southeast was one of two Miami banks surviving the Great Depression, but real estate loan problems put it on a fast takeover track.

Politically connected First Union, whose former vice chair was later appointed to the FDIC board, bought the $11 billion bank at an $81 million fire-sale price. I believe Southeast could have been saved, considering it was one of the few failed banks that cost the government nothing, a DOGE dream-come-true. First Union continued growing by acquiring and rebranding to Wachovia Bank. However, like Southeast, Wachovia had problems. Things got so bad that at one point my local Miami branch ran out of cash during the financial crisis, resulting in Wachovia being acquired by Wells Fargo.

NCNB, sarcastically interpreted as “No Cash for NoBody,” later became NationsBank and then Bank of America. The fate of Florida banking, which would henceforth be decided in Charlotte boardrooms, was sealed when it purchased Barnett Bank, aka “Florida’s Bank” in 1997. While $3 billion of divestitures were proposed for regulatory approval, my independent antitrust analysis argued for $5.6 billion, but DOJ split the difference at $4.1 billion. The $41 billion Barnett was the last big Florida bank.

By the end of 1992, Florida was the only banking colony among the biggest states according to a 1993 GAO study on which I consulted. Life in a banking colony is mainly a problem if what I call “carpetbagger banks” harvest our seniors’ deposits to lend in their home states and elsewhere. By depriving us of capital for affordable housing and small businesses, these invasive banks are like lionfish, pythons and other exotic fish, wildlife and plant species that expand and gradually take over our local native banks.

See also  Huntington launches commercial banking in Florida

The number of Florida banks and thrifts decreased from over 550 in 1990 to just 311 in 2000, 247 in 2010, 98 in 2020 and only 86 as of Dec. 31, 2024. Today, all seven of the largest retail banks operating in Florida are nonlocal, controlling nearly 60% of statewide deposits, with Bank of America, Truist and Wells Fargo, all with North Carolina roots, controlling about 40%.

Free market capitalists see nothing wrong with banking colonies or even carpetbagger banks, arguing that capital should flow to its highest return. Socially responsible capitalists like myself counter that money should flow to its highest and best use, considering its social impact on low- and moderate-income people and communities, including those of color. This is very important in my home Miami-Dade County, which is 86% minority.

Florida welcomes newly chartered and nonlocal community banks, whether via branching or M&A deals, as long as they serve the affordable housing and small-business needs of our entire community.

Source link

banking Carolina colonized Floridas industry North
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Previous ArticleStudent Loan Payments May Skyrocket Next Month For Married Borrowers, Suggests Trump Administration
Next Article Senators press Social Security on ‘dangerous’ reported employee cuts

Related Posts

How to save $1,000 in a month: 10 strategies

May 31, 2025

Here’s what banks must do to secure open banking data

May 31, 2025

How banks are getting their data ready for open banking

May 31, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Trump shifts tariff goals from trade deals

May 12, 2025

Why tax-loss harvesting can be easier with ETFs

November 15, 2024

How much cash to keep in your checking vs. savings account

April 18, 2025
Ads Banner

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

Stay informed with our finance blog! Get expert insights, money management tips, investment strategies, and the latest financial news to help you make smart financial decisions.

We're social. Connect with us:

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Top Insights

What a federal trade court block on Trump tariffs means for consumers

June 1, 2025

Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: ULTA, ABNB, GAP, AEO

June 1, 2025

The Road to the “Seven-Figure Club”

May 31, 2025
Get Informed

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

© 2025 Smartspending.ai - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.