Close Menu
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
What's Hot

Supreme Court gives DOGE access to personal Social Security data

June 10, 2025

Bank groups warn of regulators’ cybersecurity weaknesses

June 10, 2025

12 Reasons You Will Never Be A Multi-Millionaire

June 10, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Finance News
  • Personal Finance
  • Investing
  • Cards
    • Credit Cards
    • Debit
  • Insurance
  • Loans
  • Mortgage
  • More
    • Save Money
    • Banking
    • Taxes
    • Crime
Smart SpendingSmart Spending
Home»Banking»Some of the costliest bank failures have one thing in common
Banking

Some of the costliest bank failures have one thing in common

June 10, 2025No Comments6 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
Some of the costliest bank failures have one thing in common
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

When Pulaski Savings Bank went belly up in January, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said that it suspected fraud.

The small, Chicago-based lender hadn’t recorded positive core earnings since 2005, according to a recent post-mortem by the FDIC Office of Inspector General. But Pulaski limped along until December 2024, when the FDIC and Illinois regulators confirmed the observation of a bank contractor, which found that at least $20.7 million in deposit liabilities were missing from the bank’s core system.

“Since assets corresponding with these deposits were not identified, the recording of these deposits exceeded the bank’s equity capital, at which point, the bank became critically undercapitalized,” the FDIC inspector general’s office concluded.

The inspector general’s office stated that if it learns about potentially fraudulent activity during its review of a failed bank, its practice is to refer the matter to the appropriate authorities. No charges appear to have been filed to date.

Ultimately, Pulaski’s demise cost the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund $28.5 million, or 57.5% of the bank’s $49.5 million of assets. It was the costliest U.S. bank failure since 2011, when measured as a percentage of the failed bank’s assets, according to an American Banker analysis of FDIC data.

The FDIC’s data on bank failures and assistance transactions, which goes back to 1934, includes more than 4,000 entries. In a majority of those cases, the loss to a government insurance fund was less than 20% of the bank’s assets.

But there have been some major outliers, especially during the savings-and-loan crisis of the late 1980s. In many of those cases, fraud charges were eventually brought against top executives at the failed institutions.

See also  Virginia community bank announces its exit from BaaS

Fraud was found at 60% of the savings institutions that failed during that era, according to William Seidman, who chaired both the FDIC and the Resolution Trust Corporation, an agency that was established to clean up the S&L mess.

“Phony appraisals, self-dealing, loans to family and associates, kickbacks and payoffs were rife,” Seidman was quoted as saying in 1990.

What follows is a look at five S&L failures where insider fraud contributed to outsized losses to a government-run insurance fund.

Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan

McCrory, Arkansas
Loss as a percentage of assets: 53.9%

The March 2, 1989, failure of Madison Guaranty eventually entered the political realm, since it was linked to the investigations of President Bill Clinton that became known as the Whitewater saga.

But the $115 million-asset S&L, which was owned by onetime Clinton business partner Jim McDougal, failed in the same way that many other S&Ls did, according to an appendix to a special counsel’s report from 2001. Insider loans and speculative commercial real estate lending were among the problems.

“The investigation and criminal prosecutions spawned by the operation and collapse of Madison Guaranty was, in many ways, representative of what occurred throughout the United States savings and loan industry during the 1980s and early 1990s,” the special counsel’s report stated in an appendix.

After being convicted of 18 felonies, McDougal was sentenced in 1997 to three years in prison and a year of house arrest. He died in prison the following year.

Lincoln Savings & Loan
Irvine, California
Loss as a percentage of assets: 64.7%

Lincoln, which was controlled by financier Charles Keating, became the poster child for the S&L crisis.

See also  FDIC upheaval offers crypto opportunity, bank uncertainty

Keating made large contributions to five U.S. senators in an effort to exert political pressure that might prevent Lincoln’s shutdown — an episode that became known as the “Keating Five” scandal.

The House Banking Committee chairman later accused Keating of using the $4.86 billion-asset S&L as his “own personal ATM.” When Lincoln was eventually seized by the government in April 1989, it reportedly had only $20 million of capital, far below the $325 million it should have had.

Some of the biggest losers in the episode were savers who got persuaded to move their funds from federally insured deposits to junk bonds backed by another company that Keating ran.

Keating eventually served four-and-a-half years in prison. He died in 2014 at age 90.

Vernon Savings & Loan

Vernon, Texas
Loss as a percentage of assets: 78.8%

The failure of Vernon in 1987 featured some of the biggest excesses of the entire S&L debacle.

The thrift’s owner, Don Ray Dixon, reportedly had a $2.6 million yacht and a fleet of planes. Prosecutors alleged that he used the S&L’s funds to make illegal contributions to politicians, and to pay prostitutes to attend a party in San Diego Harbor.

Before the $1.35 billion-asset thrift failed, it took advantage of looser rules on the deposit rates that thrifts could pay to fuel a high-risk lending binge.

Dixon was sentenced in 1991 to five years in prison, though he was freed early after cooperating with the government.

Independent American Savings Association

Irving, Texas
Loss as a percentage of assets: 156%

After the failure of Independent American in May 1987, authorities spent years pursuing criminal charges against its owner, Thomas Gaubert. 

See also  Six bank M&A deals in 2024 top $1 billion

Gaubert was acquitted in 1988 in connection with his role at an Iowa S&L. But five years later — after prosecutors alleged that he fraudulently diverted roughly $333,000 in assets from a partnership that he’d placed in bankruptcy proceedings — he was convicted on federal bank fraud and money-laundering charges.

During Gaubert’s tenure at Independent American, its assets grew rapidly, and large amounts of loans soon started going bad. The S&L, which had around $1 billion of assets when it was shuttered, ended up costing $1.58 billion to resolve.

Sunbelt Savings Association of Texas

Dallas, Texas
Loss as a percentage of assets: 171.1%

The August 1988 demise of Sunbelt Savings, known as “Gunbelt Savings” because of its easy lending activities, was only the beginning of the legal odyssey for its former CEO.

Edwin T. McBirney III pleaded guilty to bank fraud in 1993 and did time in prison. The same year, he also entered into a settlement agreement with the FDIC. An $8.5 million judgment was entered in favor of the FDIC, and McBirney agreed to make payments based on his annual gross income.

But later on, McBirney fraudulently concealed more than $1 million in income from the FDIC by using a trust he had set up as his alter ego, prosecutors alleged.

In 2006, McBirney was sentenced to 97 months in prison and ordered to pay more than $2.3 million. “Criminals who evade paying criminal restitution will be brought to justice, just like Mr. McBirney,” then U.S. Attorney Richard Roper said in a press release at the time.

Source link

Bank common costliest failures
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Previous ArticleThe GOP Falls In Love With Red Tape To Force People Off Federal Programs
Next Article Walmart taps own fintech firm for credit cards after Capital One exit

Related Posts

Bank groups warn of regulators’ cybersecurity weaknesses

June 10, 2025

Medallion Financial settles with SEC over fraud charges

June 9, 2025

High-yield savings rates today: June 9, 2025 | Best APY decreases slightly to 4.30%

June 9, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

BlackRock predicts another historic year for crypto

January 17, 2025

Energy Price Cap Rise – How to Beat Increasing Costs

February 26, 2025

McKernan tapped for Treasury post, CFPB future unclear

May 10, 2025
Ads Banner

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

Stay informed with our finance blog! Get expert insights, money management tips, investment strategies, and the latest financial news to help you make smart financial decisions.

We're social. Connect with us:

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Top Insights

Supreme Court gives DOGE access to personal Social Security data

June 10, 2025

Bank groups warn of regulators’ cybersecurity weaknesses

June 10, 2025

12 Reasons You Will Never Be A Multi-Millionaire

June 10, 2025
Get Informed

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to Get the Latest Financial Tips and Insights Delivered to Your Inbox!

© 2025 Smartspending.ai - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.